<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jargon Shmargon (and Other PR Blog Jots)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html</link>
	<description>Getting to the Point of Social Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-109872</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-109872</guid>
		<description>Well, Crystal Clear Writing- the most effective way to communicate to people on all walks of life. This should be considered specially if you are writing an article. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Crystal Clear Writing- the most effective way to communicate to people on all walks of life. This should be considered specially if you are writing an article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyree Cicero</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-32079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyree Cicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-32079</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pleased I found this weblog, I couldnt obtain any info on this topic prior to. Also manage a niche site and for anyone who is ever serious in doing some visitor writing for me make sure you feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my website. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased I found this weblog, I couldnt obtain any info on this topic prior to. Also manage a niche site and for anyone who is ever serious in doing some visitor writing for me make sure you feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my website. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Amerman</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-26539</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Amerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-26539</guid>
		<description>This is a very intriguing post, I was looking for this information. Just so you know I located your weblog when I was doing research for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very intriguing post, I was looking for this information. Just so you know I located your weblog when I was doing research for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Wurrey</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Wurrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Speaking of kindred spirits! i share your cynicism and would have asked the same question, hah. But no, media Bullseye wasn&#039;t yet a twinkle in my eye when I started engaging...It was kind of a step by step process for me, I suppose.
I agree I could expand my horizons and freshen up my  RSS feeds on a more regular basis, it definitely gets tricky when you have to keep tabs on so many!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of kindred spirits! i share your cynicism and would have asked the same question, hah. But no, media Bullseye wasn&#8217;t yet a twinkle in my eye when I started engaging&#8230;It was kind of a step by step process for me, I suppose.<br />
I agree I could expand my horizons and freshen up my  RSS feeds on a more regular basis, it definitely gets tricky when you have to keep tabs on so many!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Gombita</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Gombita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-532</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome, Sarah. I actually find it quite intriguing the vehemence of the &quot;there is no clique&quot; argument. If you aren&#039;t a part of a clique, why would one waste posting space arguing that such things don&#039;t exist?
&quot;They were all very friendly and open with me, answered my questions, responded to my comments, etc. that is obviously just my personal experience...&quot;
OK, the cynical moi must ask: when you began actively participating in social media, were you already working for (and contributing articles) to an industry trade publication?
I mean, come on, if you give folks virtual ink love, of course they are going to be friendly and open with you. The fact that they like you just makes the experience more enjoyable on both sides.
The danger, of course, is if you continually highlight posts, etc., because those are the people/blogs/podcasts of which you are familiar and friendly with, who *isn&#039;t* getting deserved coverage, because they aren&#039;t Twittering (or whatever) along with the existing gang?
Cheers,
Judy
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Sarah. I actually find it quite intriguing the vehemence of the &#8220;there is no clique&#8221; argument. If you aren&#8217;t a part of a clique, why would one waste posting space arguing that such things don&#8217;t exist?<br />
&#8220;They were all very friendly and open with me, answered my questions, responded to my comments, etc. that is obviously just my personal experience&#8230;&#8221;<br />
OK, the cynical moi must ask: when you began actively participating in social media, were you already working for (and contributing articles) to an industry trade publication?<br />
I mean, come on, if you give folks virtual ink love, of course they are going to be friendly and open with you. The fact that they like you just makes the experience more enjoyable on both sides.<br />
The danger, of course, is if you continually highlight posts, etc., because those are the people/blogs/podcasts of which you are familiar and friendly with, who *isn&#8217;t* getting deserved coverage, because they aren&#8217;t Twittering (or whatever) along with the existing gang?<br />
Cheers,<br />
Judy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Wurrey</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Wurrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your input, Judy! I absolutely agree with you about throwing out the old rules, and that the blogosphere is an amazing place to seek out kindred spirits.
I suppose the only reason I disagree with the clique assessment is that I still consider myself relatively new to the social media world, and I actually didn&#039;t have much trouble getting to know a lot of the people who&#039;ve been accused of being cliquish...  They were all very friendly and open with me, answered my questions, responded to my comments, etc. that is obviously just my personal experience, but I suppose that&#039;s where my analysis of Geoff&#039;s post came from.
Thanks for contributing!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your input, Judy! I absolutely agree with you about throwing out the old rules, and that the blogosphere is an amazing place to seek out kindred spirits.<br />
I suppose the only reason I disagree with the clique assessment is that I still consider myself relatively new to the social media world, and I actually didn&#8217;t have much trouble getting to know a lot of the people who&#8217;ve been accused of being cliquish&#8230;  They were all very friendly and open with me, answered my questions, responded to my comments, etc. that is obviously just my personal experience, but I suppose that&#8217;s where my analysis of Geoff&#8217;s post came from.<br />
Thanks for contributing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Gombita</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2008/02/jargon-shmargon-and-other-pr-blog-jots.html/comment-page-1#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Gombita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabullseye.com/?p=264#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Re: Click, Clique, Boom. Hmmm. I see that post has generated seven comments so far: Five from folks on the existing blogroll, one from the author, one commenter with no last name.
In comparison, Jenn Mattern&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://nakedpr.com/2008/01/21/why-i-wont-join-your-pr-blog-party/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why I Won’t Join Your PR Blog Party&lt;/a&gt; (because let&#039;s not kid ourselves about who was being targeted) generated 27 comments and 3 trackbacks. Of the 27 comments, five were responses by Jenn Mattern to commenters, four came from individuals on her Blogs I Can Stomach blogroll (including me), plus  15 other individuals (one twice).
Note that the majority of commenters agreed with her assessment. It seems that many who disagreed with her tended to Twitter about it...you know, amongst old friends.
Rather than the recommendation to &quot;create your own group of friends within the PR blogosphere,&quot; I&#039;d suggest individuals seek out blogs, etc., that really do welcome new (in addition to the more-established) people and independent voices. You don&#039;t have to play by the unspoken code and rules of an &quot;old&quot; (by social media standards) hierarchy about what constitutes &quot;proper&quot; blogger outreach, engagement and reciprocal link-love...that&#039;s the beauty of the blogosphere, discovering fresh/new voices and kindred/generous spirits from all over the place.
As a side note, if I determine that bloggers are &quot;ungenerous&quot; or ignore/marginalize my comments and concerns...I certainly move on! (And have in many cases.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Click, Clique, Boom. Hmmm. I see that post has generated seven comments so far: Five from folks on the existing blogroll, one from the author, one commenter with no last name.<br />
In comparison, Jenn Mattern&#8217;s <a href="http://nakedpr.com/2008/01/21/why-i-wont-join-your-pr-blog-party/" rel="nofollow">Why I Won’t Join Your PR Blog Party</a> (because let&#8217;s not kid ourselves about who was being targeted) generated 27 comments and 3 trackbacks. Of the 27 comments, five were responses by Jenn Mattern to commenters, four came from individuals on her Blogs I Can Stomach blogroll (including me), plus  15 other individuals (one twice).<br />
Note that the majority of commenters agreed with her assessment. It seems that many who disagreed with her tended to Twitter about it&#8230;you know, amongst old friends.<br />
Rather than the recommendation to &#8220;create your own group of friends within the PR blogosphere,&#8221; I&#8217;d suggest individuals seek out blogs, etc., that really do welcome new (in addition to the more-established) people and independent voices. You don&#8217;t have to play by the unspoken code and rules of an &#8220;old&#8221; (by social media standards) hierarchy about what constitutes &#8220;proper&#8221; blogger outreach, engagement and reciprocal link-love&#8230;that&#8217;s the beauty of the blogosphere, discovering fresh/new voices and kindred/generous spirits from all over the place.<br />
As a side note, if I determine that bloggers are &#8220;ungenerous&#8221; or ignore/marginalize my comments and concerns&#8230;I certainly move on! (And have in many cases.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
